This HTML5 document contains 11 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

Prefix	IRI
dcterms	http://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbnary	http://kaiko.getalp.org/dbnary#
skos	http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
ontolex	http://www.w3.org/ns/lemon/ontolex#
rdf	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
xsdh	http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
dbnary-eng	http://kaiko.getalp.org/dbnary/eng/

Statements

Subject Item

dbnary-eng:__ws_5_benefit__Noun__1

rdf:type

ontolex:LexicalSense

dbnary:senseNumber

5

skos:definition

_:vb6328922

skos:example

_:vb6328923 _:vb6328924 _:vb6328925

Subject Item

_:vb6328922

rdf:value

Intended audience (as for the benefit of).

Subject Item

_:vb6328923

rdf:value

The whole scene was staged for his benefit, and it completely fooled him.

Subject Item

_:vb6328924

rdf:value

Since my wife is Canadian, whenever we have dinner with my family, they keep bringing up anything they've heard about Canada lately for her benefit.

Subject Item

_:vb6328925

rdf:value

So, if Obodzinski is correct in saying that Mrs. Piela actually signed a document in the coffee shop, in front of witnesses, she staged a scene, pretending that it was the alleged Mandate. The other explanation is that none of this ever took place, and the staging was only a fictitious creation for the benefit of the Court.

dcterms:bibliographicCitation

2020 April 16, Gary D.D. Morrison, J.S.C., “Succession de Kalimbet Piela c. Obodzinski, 2020 QCCS 1222”, in CanLII‎[1], retrieved 9 May 2021: