This HTML5 document contains 20 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbnaryhttp://kaiko.getalp.org/dbnary#
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
ontolexhttp://www.w3.org/ns/lemon/ontolex#
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
dbnary-enghttp://kaiko.getalp.org/dbnary/eng/

Statements

Subject Item
dbnary-eng:__ws_1_beat__Verb__1
rdf:type
ontolex:LexicalSense
dbnary:senseNumber
1
dbnary:synonym
dbnary-eng:knock dbnary-eng:hammer dbnary-eng:strike dbnary-eng:pound dbnary-eng:whack
skos:definition
_:vb6943014
skos:example
_:vb6943018 _:vb6943016 _:vb6943017 _:vb6943015
Subject Item
_:vb6943014
rdf:value
(transitive) To hit; to strike.
Subject Item
_:vb6943015
rdf:value
As soon as she heard that her father had died, she went into a rage and beat the wall with her fists until her knuckles bled.
Subject Item
_:vb6943016
rdf:value
Thomas Limbrick, who was only nine years of age, said he lived with his mother when Deborah was beat: that his mother throwed her down all along with her hands; and then against a wall […]
dcterms:bibliographicCitation
1825?, “Hannah Limbrick, Executed for Murder”, in The Newgate Calendar: comprising interesting memoirs of the most notorious characters, page 231:
Subject Item
_:vb6943017
rdf:value
The case of a woman named Qu Hua from Qiqihaer, Heilongjiang, illustrates this possibility. She married a worker named Xu Baocheng in 1980, and they got along very well until she gave birth to a girl. Then Xu immediately began to beat Qu, and forced her and the baby to live in a small shack.
dcterms:bibliographicCitation
1988, Emily Honig, Gail Hershatter, “Divorce”, in Personal Voices: Chinese Women in the 1980's‎[1], Stanford, Cali.: Stanford University Press, →ISBN, →LCCN, →OCLC, page 219:
Subject Item
_:vb6943018
rdf:value
In this account of events, the cards were stacked against Clemons from the beginning. His appeal lawyers have argued that he was physically beaten into making a confession, the jury was wrongfully selected and misdirected, and his conviction largely achieved on individual testimony with no supporting forensic evidence presented.
dcterms:bibliographicCitation
2012 August 21, Ed Pilkington, “Death penalty on trial: should Reggie Clemons live or die?”, in The Guardian‎[1]: