This HTML5 document contains 17 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbnaryhttp://kaiko.getalp.org/dbnary#
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
ontolexhttp://www.w3.org/ns/lemon/ontolex#
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
dbnary-enghttp://kaiko.getalp.org/dbnary/eng/

Statements

Subject Item
dbnary-eng:__ws_1_adposition__Noun__1
rdf:type
ontolex:LexicalSense
dbnary:hyponym
dbnary-eng:circumposition dbnary-eng:postposition dbnary-eng:preposition
dbnary:senseNumber
1
dbnary:synonym
dbnary-eng:preposition
skos:definition
_:vb6852009
skos:example
_:vb6852010 _:vb6852011 _:vb6852012
Subject Item
_:vb6852009
rdf:value
(grammar) An element that combines syntactically with a phrase and indicates how that phrase should be interpreted in the surrounding context; a preposition or postposition.
Subject Item
_:vb6852010
rdf:value
Throughout this book, I have assumed that adpositions (prepositions and postpositions) are not lexical categories, but rather functional categories. […] While this view of adpositions is far from unprecedented, it runs contrary to the more standard generative treatment, championed by Jackendoff (1977: 31-33), in which adpositions constitute a fourth lexical category, filling out the logical space of possibilities defined by the two binary-valued features +\!/\!\!-\!\!\mathsf N and +\!/\!\!-\!\!\mathsf V.
dcterms:bibliographicCitation
2003, Mark C. Baker, Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives, Cambridge University Press, page 303:
Subject Item
_:vb6852011
rdf:value
It is well known in West African linguistics that languages in this broad sense display adpositions that emerge out of these two sources, namely nouns and verbs.
dcterms:bibliographicCitation
2008, Amani Bohoussou, Stavros Skopeteas, Grammaticalization of spatial adpositions in Nànáfwê, Elisabeth Verhoeven, Stavros Skopeteas, Yong-Min Shin, Yoko Nishina, Johannes Helmbrecht (editors), Studies on Grammaticalization, Walter de Gruyter (Mouton), page 77,
Subject Item
_:vb6852012
rdf:value
By establishing adpositions as a constantly referred to but never really demonstrated language category, this book has provided a basis for the theory of the linguistic category. […] Adpositions could be considered a clear-cut category if one relied on syntax only, for one simple reason: the are specialized in function-marking.
dcterms:bibliographicCitation
2010, Claude Hagège, Adpositions, Oxford University Press, page 332: