This HTML5 document contains 33 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbnaryhttp://kaiko.getalp.org/dbnary#
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
ontolexhttp://www.w3.org/ns/lemon/ontolex#
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
dbnary-enghttp://kaiko.getalp.org/dbnary/eng/

Statements

Subject Item
dbnary-eng:__ws_1_abstruse__Adjective__1
rdf:type
ontolex:LexicalSense
dbnary:antonym
dbnary-eng:obvious dbnary-eng:clear dbnary-eng:understandable
dbnary:senseNumber
1
dbnary:synonym
dbnary-eng:arcane dbnary-eng:recondite dbnary-eng:abstrusive dbnary-eng:cryptic dbnary-eng:esoteric
skos:definition
_:vb6313870
skos:example
_:vb6313871 _:vb6313876 _:vb6313877 _:vb6313874 _:vb6313875 _:vb6313872 _:vb6313873
Subject Item
_:vb6313870
rdf:value
Difficult to comprehend or understand; obscure. [from mid 16th c.]
Subject Item
_:vb6313871
rdf:value
Some time the good makithe an ile end⸝ ãd the ile a godd. In this opiniõ⸝ and in ſcrutable miſterie be werithe all his wittes⸝ and at the end of his cogitacions⸝ fyndithe more abſtruſe⸝ and doutfull obiections thẽ at the beginning⸝ […]
dcterms:bibliographicCitation
[1548], Joanne Hopper [i.e., John Hooper], “Curiositie”, in A Declaration of the Ten Holy Cõmaundementes of Allmygthye God […], [Zurich]: [Christoph Froschauer], →OCLC, page CCXVIII:
Subject Item
_:vb6313872
rdf:value
Be leſs abſtruſe, my riddling days are paſt.
dcterms:bibliographicCitation
1671, John Milton, “Samson Agonistes, […].”, in Paradise Regain’d. A Poem. In IV Books. To which is Added, Samson Agonistes, London: […] J. M[acock] for John Starkey […], →OCLC, page 65, line 75:
Subject Item
_:vb6313873
rdf:value
Thoſe propoſitions relating to the Moon's motion, which are demonſtrated in the Principia [by Isaac Newton], do generally depend on calculations very intricate and abſtruſe, the truth of which is not eaſily examined, even by thoſe that are moſt skilful; […]
dcterms:bibliographicCitation
1729, John Machin, “The Laws of the Moon’s Motion According to Gravity”, in Isaac Newton, translated by Andrew Motte, The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. […] , volume II, London: […] Benjamin Motte, […], →OCLC, page 4:
Subject Item
_:vb6313874
rdf:value
'Tis certain, that the eaſy and obvious Philoſophy vvill always, vvith the Generality of Mankind, have the Preference to the accurate and abſtruſe; and by many vvill be recommended, not only as more agreeable, but more uſeful than the other.
dcterms:bibliographicCitation
1748, [David Hume], “Essay I. Of the Different Species of Philosophy.”, in Philosophical Essays Concerning Human Understanding, London: […] A[ndrew] Millar, […], →OCLC, page 3:
Subject Item
_:vb6313875
rdf:value
The objects of geometrical enquiry are ſo intirely abſracted from thoſe purſuits vvhich ſtir up and put in motion the unruly paſſions of the human heart, that mankind vvithout difficulty adopt not only the more ſimple theorems of the ſcience, but even thoſe abſtruſe paradoxes, vvhich hovvever they may appear ſuſceptible of demonſtration, are at variance vvith the natural conceptions vvhich the mind, vvithout the aid of philoſophy, vvould be led to entertain upon the ſubject.
dcterms:bibliographicCitation
1788, Publius [pseudonym; Alexander Hamilton], “Number XXXI. The Same Subject Continued [Concerning Taxation].”, in The Federalist: A Collection of Essays, Written in Favour of the New Constitution, […] , volume I, New York, N.Y.: […] J. and A. M‘Lean, […], →OCLC, page 191:
Subject Item
_:vb6313876
rdf:value
In a thousand ways he smoothed for me the path of knowledge, and made the most abstruse inquiries clear and facile to my apprehension.
dcterms:bibliographicCitation
1831 October 30, Mary W[ollstonecraft] Shelley, chapter IV, in Frankenstein: Or, The Modern Prometheus (Standard Novels; IX), 3rd edition, London: Henry Colburn and Richard Bentley, […], →OCLC, page 36:
Subject Item
_:vb6313877
rdf:value
A second rescript followed, commanding all bishops not merely to subscribe the dominant opinions on these profound and abstruse topics, but to condemn their authors, Pelagius and Cœlestius, as irreclaimable heretics, and this under pain of deprivation and banishment.
dcterms:bibliographicCitation
1854, Henry Hart Milman, “Pelagianism”, in History of Latin Christianity; […], volume I, London: John Murray, […], →OCLC, book II, page 127: